Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:  
[[Atheism is a religion]] and you have no extraordinary evidence for a naturalistic origin of life.  
 
[[Atheism is a religion]] and you have no extraordinary evidence for a naturalistic origin of life.  
   −
Next, you are being illogical. Historians recognize that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Nevertheless, unlike the religion of atheism which has a total lack of proof and evidence that it is true, Christianity has an abundance of proof and evidence that it is true. See: [[Christian apologetics websites|Evidence for Christianity]].  
+
Next, you are being illogical. Sound [[historiography]] recognizes that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence - especially when it comes to ancient history (see: Atheism and historical illiteracy]]). Nevertheless, unlike the religion of atheism which has a total lack of proof and evidence that it is true, Christianity has an abundance of proof and evidence that it is true. See: [[Christian apologetics websites|Evidence for Christianity]].  
    
Lastly, using the definition of atheism that encyclopedias of philosophy use for the word atheism (see: [[Attempts to dilute the definition of atheism]]), please provide us proof and evidence that atheism is true.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:58, 9 March 2015 (EDT)
 
Lastly, using the definition of atheism that encyclopedias of philosophy use for the word atheism (see: [[Attempts to dilute the definition of atheism]]), please provide us proof and evidence that atheism is true.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:58, 9 March 2015 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,458

edits

Navigation menu