Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,716
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 998:
Line 998: + +
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 23:52, March 15, 2015
, 23:52, March 15, 2015→Sloppy presentation of block reasons
We recently had a user (Burke39) blocked for 2 months for "inserting false information". Some of his edits were later reverted by the blocking sysop, some were left alone, and some were praised on that sysop's own talk page. This raises the question: What were the false edits? There's too much stuff for me to track down. But, since he may come back in 2 months, he's going to want to know. Could someone leave a note on his talk page explaining just what it is that he must not do when he comes back? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 19:45, 15 March 2015 (EDT)
We recently had a user (Burke39) blocked for 2 months for "inserting false information". Some of his edits were later reverted by the blocking sysop, some were left alone, and some were praised on that sysop's own talk page. This raises the question: What were the false edits? There's too much stuff for me to track down. But, since he may come back in 2 months, he's going to want to know. Could someone leave a note on his talk page explaining just what it is that he must not do when he comes back? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 19:45, 15 March 2015 (EDT)
:I blocked Burke39 and corrected his edits mainly in a group. You can browse my contributions and can usually tell by the description. He also did some odd removals. I am not completely sure that the block doesn't need to be increased somewhat. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] 19:52, 15 March 2015 (EDT)