Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  16:56, April 18, 2007
Line 24: Line 24:  
What, you think conservapedia ISN'T Biased? Ha, considering it was set up as a reaction to the so called liberalised Wikipedia, it's done a pretty poor job of presenting fair and unbiased arguments. Conservapedia is just a polar opposite, it's not balanced at all.
 
What, you think conservapedia ISN'T Biased? Ha, considering it was set up as a reaction to the so called liberalised Wikipedia, it's done a pretty poor job of presenting fair and unbiased arguments. Conservapedia is just a polar opposite, it's not balanced at all.
   −
Conservapedia shouldn't be biased in a bad way, but we should devinatly be putting accross our point of view.  It is obvious that Jesus was the son of G-d, and so any parts of Islam which contradic Christianity must be considered false.  Surely we should not shy away from speaking the truth!!! -Mmeelliissssaa
+
Conservapedia shouldn't be biased in a bad way, but we should definatly be putting accross our point of view.  It is obvious that Jesus was the son of G-d, and so any parts of Islam which contradic Christianity must be considered false.  Surely we should not shy away from speaking the truth!!! -Mmeelliissssaa

Navigation menu