Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
57 bytes added ,  16:57, April 18, 2007
no edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:     
What, you think conservapedia ISN'T Biased? Ha, considering it was set up as a reaction to the so called liberalised Wikipedia, it's done a pretty poor job of presenting fair and unbiased arguments. Conservapedia is just a polar opposite, it's not balanced at all.
 
What, you think conservapedia ISN'T Biased? Ha, considering it was set up as a reaction to the so called liberalised Wikipedia, it's done a pretty poor job of presenting fair and unbiased arguments. Conservapedia is just a polar opposite, it's not balanced at all.
 +
 +
== We should not shy away from speaking the Truth!!! ==
    
Conservapedia shouldn't be biased in a bad way, but we should definatly be putting accross our point of view.  It is obvious that Jesus was the son of G-d, and so any parts of Islam which contradic Christianity must be considered false.  Surely we should not shy away from speaking the truth!!! -Mmeelliissssaa
 
Conservapedia shouldn't be biased in a bad way, but we should definatly be putting accross our point of view.  It is obvious that Jesus was the son of G-d, and so any parts of Islam which contradic Christianity must be considered false.  Surely we should not shy away from speaking the truth!!! -Mmeelliissssaa

Navigation menu