1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − + Line 19:
Line 19: + +
Fixed unnecessary adjectives
'''Neil deGrasse Tyson''' is an astrophyicist and Director of the Hayden Planetarium. Like the [[agnosticism|agnostic]] and [[evolution]]ist [[Richard Dawkins]], he is a very public figure, having been featured on various popular media programs such as the [[History Channel]], where he has promoted his agnostic, [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific ]] and [[history|unhistorical]] [[worldview]].<ref>[http://bigthink.com/think-tank/neil-degrasse-tyson-atheist-or-agnostic Is Neil deGrasse Tyson an atheist or agnostic?]</ref> He is the director of the Hayden Planetarium <ref>[http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/about/message Hayden Planetarium - About]</ref> and a member of the Planetary Society, but is not a professor. In 2014, Tyson was the host of 'Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey' <ref>[http://www.cosmosontv.com/ Cosmos]</ref> which is an updated version of the agnostic [[Carl Sagan|Carl Sagan's]] 1980 documentary entitled Cosmos: A Personal Voyage.
'''Neil deGrasse Tyson''' is an astrophyicist and Director of the Hayden Planetarium. Like the [[agnosticism|agnostic]] and [[evolution]]ist [[Richard Dawkins]], he is a very public figure, having been featured on various popular media programs such as the [[History Channel]], where he has promoted his agnostic, [[scientific]] [[worldview]].<ref>[http://bigthink.com/think-tank/neil-degrasse-tyson-atheist-or-agnostic Is Neil deGrasse Tyson an atheist or agnostic?]</ref> He is the director of the Hayden Planetarium <ref>[http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/about/message Hayden Planetarium - About]</ref> and a member of the Planetary Society. In 2014, Tyson was the host of 'Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey' <ref>[http://www.cosmosontv.com/ Cosmos]</ref> which is an updated version of the agnostic [[Carl Sagan|Carl Sagan's]] 1980 documentary entitled Cosmos: A Personal Voyage.
Nor it is clear why Tyson objects to the term "360-degree turn". A politician might well reverse his views on an issue twice, and that could be described as a 360-degree turn.
Nor it is clear why Tyson objects to the term "360-degree turn". A politician might well reverse his views on an issue twice, and that could be described as a 360-degree turn.
Hey Andy, attacking Tyson on your pathetic wiki does nothing. No matter what you do, your resume and your credentials will always be the equivalent of dog shit, especially when compared with someone like Tyson's. Sure he made a few misquotes, however he later admitted he was wrong, like a true scientist does. YOU, on the other hand, REFUSE TO ADMIT YOU'RE WRONG (or acting like a spoiled brat) when you OBVIOUSLY are (FBI Incident and Lenski Affair ring any bells?). Grow up, you pathetic imbecile.
== See also ==
== See also ==