Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,697
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: − − Hey Andy, attacking Tyson on your pathetic wiki does nothing. No matter what you do, your resume and your credentials will always be the equivalent of dog shit, especially when compared with someone like Tyson's. Sure he made a few misquotes, however he later admitted he was wrong, like a true scientist does. YOU, on the other hand, REFUSE TO ADMIT YOU'RE WRONG (or acting like a spoiled brat) when you OBVIOUSLY are (FBI Incident and Lenski Affair ring any bells?). Grow up, you pathetic imbecile.
Undo revision 1152321 by DewDrinker88 (talk)
Nor it is clear why Tyson objects to the term "360-degree turn". A politician might well reverse his views on an issue twice, and that could be described as a 360-degree turn.
Nor it is clear why Tyson objects to the term "360-degree turn". A politician might well reverse his views on an issue twice, and that could be described as a 360-degree turn.
== See also ==
== See also ==