Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Joke Source: @Aschlafly
Line 17: Line 17:     
:::August, perhaps our disagreement here reflects our different "worldviews".  I think brilliant insights can emanate from sources that may be disfavored by "experts".  I welcome the [[best of the public]].  But non-[[Christian]] approaches tend to favor censorship, and tend to favor rejecting anything not approved by the atheistic-leaning "establishment".  I welcome the inclusion of the [[Epistles to the Hebrews]] in the Bible despite how the experts cannot identify the source.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:59, 29 May 2015 (EDT)
 
:::August, perhaps our disagreement here reflects our different "worldviews".  I think brilliant insights can emanate from sources that may be disfavored by "experts".  I welcome the [[best of the public]].  But non-[[Christian]] approaches tend to favor censorship, and tend to favor rejecting anything not approved by the atheistic-leaning "establishment".  I welcome the inclusion of the [[Epistles to the Hebrews]] in the Bible despite how the experts cannot identify the source.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:59, 29 May 2015 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::*As usual, I'm the advocate of diligence: quoting the first one you find to agree with you on the internet isn't proper research, it's just laziness. Your reasoning boils down to "hey, look at this guy, I like his opinion, he must be the best of the public"
 +
::::*I don't know what to make of your line ''"But non-Christian approaches tend to favor censorship"'' - I'd say that my approach follows the idea of "trust, but verify".
 +
::::*''"I welcome the inclusion of the [[Epistles to the Hebrews]] in the Bible despite how the experts cannot identify the source."'' Who doesn't? The authorship and the sources of many parts of the Bible are inviting  lively debate. I just find your idea of the divine authorship of this particular Epistle especially nonsensical. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:22, 29 May 2015 (EDT)
 +
::::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:22, 29 May 2015 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu