Changes

::::*As usual, I'm the advocate of diligence: quoting the first one you find to agree with you on the internet isn't proper research, it's just laziness. Your reasoning boils down to "hey, look at this guy, I like his opinion, he must be the best of the public"

::::*As usual, I'm the advocate of diligence: quoting the first one you find to agree with you on the internet isn't proper research, it's just laziness. Your reasoning boils down to "hey, look at this guy, I like his opinion, he must be the best of the public"

::::*I don't know what to make of your line ''"But non-Christian approaches tend to favor censorship"'' - I'd say that my approach follows the idea of "trust, but verify".  

::::*I don't know what to make of your line ''"But non-Christian approaches tend to favor censorship"'' - I'd say that my approach follows the idea of "trust, but verify".  

::::*''"I welcome the inclusion of the [[Epistles to the Hebrews]] in the Bible despite how the experts cannot identify the source."'' Who doesn't welcome the inclusion? The authorship and the sources of many parts of the Bible are inviting  lively debate. I just find your idea of the divine authorship of this particular Epistle especially nonsensical. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:22, 29 May 2015 (EDT)

::::*''"I welcome the inclusion of the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] in the Bible despite how the experts cannot identify the source."'' Who doesn't welcome the inclusion? The authorship and the sources of many parts of the Bible are inviting  lively debate. I just find your idea of the divine authorship of this particular Epistle especially nonsensical. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:22, 29 May 2015 (EDT)

::::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:22, 29 May 2015 (EDT)

::::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:22, 29 May 2015 (EDT)