Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24:
Line 24: + + + + + +
→Not a Joke Source
:::::A work should be judged on its merit, not based on whether someone disapproves of comedy found elsewhere by the same author. Many great works would be rejected if "trust but verify" meant scrutinizing (without a sense of humor) everything else the person wrote.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:02, 30 May 2015 (EDT)
:::::A work should be judged on its merit, not based on whether someone disapproves of comedy found elsewhere by the same author. Many great works would be rejected if "trust but verify" meant scrutinizing (without a sense of humor) everything else the person wrote.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:02, 30 May 2015 (EDT)
::::::*''"A work should be judged on its merit, not based on whether someone disapproves of comedy found elsewhere by the same author.''" I'm not disapproving of his comedy, as there is no comedy anywhere on his site. He is dead serious.
::::::*I'm judging the merit of his work by his writing about Cantor's diagonal argument.
::::::*A stopped clock may be right twice a day. But even at these occasions, it is not a good source for the correct time!
::::::*I stand by my previous headline: the source is a joke, though it is not funny at all
::::::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 03:00, 30 May 2015 (EDT)