Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)

Revision as of 18:41, June 14, 2015

393 bytes added ,  18:41, June 14, 2015
Broken clocks are right twice a day, and chance occurrences cannot remedy logical flaws.
Line 1: Line 1:  
Andy, please take a shot at [[E=mc^2#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton]]! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:29, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
 
Andy, please take a shot at [[E=mc^2#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton]]! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:29, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
 +
 +
:August, you overrely on one outdated experiment that was not even honored for proving E=mc<sup>2</sup>.  Even if your somewhat novel view of the significance of the experiment were correct, the formula would still have to comply with logic.  Broken clocks are right twice a day, and chance occurrences cannot remedy logical flaws.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:41, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1159213"

Navigation menu