Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)
Revision as of 18:45, June 14, 2015
, 18:45, June 14, 2015So, quit stalling, and answer the questions, please
:August, you overrely on one outdated experiment that was not even honored for proving E=mc<sup>2</sup>. Even if your somewhat novel view of the significance of the experiment were correct, the formula would still have to comply with logic. Broken clocks are right twice a day, and chance occurrences cannot remedy logical flaws.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:41, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
:August, you overrely on one outdated experiment that was not even honored for proving E=mc<sup>2</sup>. Even if your somewhat novel view of the significance of the experiment were correct, the formula would still have to comply with logic. Broken clocks are right twice a day, and chance occurrences cannot remedy logical flaws.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:41, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
::This experiment has been repeated thousands of times, it is done in many physics courses at colleges and universities as it provides an easy understanding of this subject. Therefore, it should be approachable to you. So, quit stalling, and answer the questions, please! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:45, 14 June 2015 (EDT)