Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,697
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − '''Crank''' (also known as a '''crackpot''' or '''kook''') is the [[pejorative]] term for a person who hold beliefs or views that run contradictory to prevailing theories. While dictionaries may define a crank as "overly enthusiastic about a particular subject or activity<ref>http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/crank</ref> or "an unbalanced person who is overzealous in the advocacy of a private cause<ref>http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/crank</ref>", it is generally reserved for persons who hold radical ideas well outside of the mainstream in the areas of science and technology. While the term "quack" is used solely for a person who holds such views pertaining to the field of medicine. + − − == Attributes of a crank == − Famed science and mathematics writer [[Martin Gardner]] cataloged what he believed were the common signs of a crank<ref>http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=hermits-and-cranks-lesson</ref><ref>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/07/08/martin-gardners-signs-of-a-crank/</ref>. First Gardner notes "...most important of these traits is that cranks work in almost total isolation from their colleagues" and that "a second characteristic of the [crank], which greatly strengthens his isolation, is a tendency toward paranoia." In addition Gardner highlighted some of the following characteristics: − *Overestimation of one's own intelligence, knowledge, or proficiency. − *Underestimation of the intelligence of critics and peers − *Belief there is a [[Atheism and the suppression of science|conspiracy]] to either suppress [[Young earth creationism|their ideas]] or artificially bolster the [[Evolution|prevailing idea]]. − *A tendency to attack the most well-established scientists and scientific theories. − − Mathematician [[John Baez]] developed a list of attributes known as the ''Crackpot Index'' which he bills as "A simple method for rating potentially revolutionary contributions to physics.<ref>http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html</ref>" The index contains a list of statements for the reader to consider, and assigns a point value to each item the reader agrees with. The more points accumulated, the more of a "crackpot" the reader is in the author's eyes. Some of the items include: − *"...claim that [[Special theory of relativity|special]] or [[general relativity]] are [[Logical_Flaws_in_E%3Dmc²|fundamentally misguided]] (without good evidence)." − *"...arguing that a current [[Evolution|well-established theory]] is "only a theory", as if this were somehow a point against it." − *"...offering [[Kent_Hovind#.24250.2C000_Offer|prize money]] to anyone who proves and/or finds any flaws in your theory." − *"...claiming you have a [[Intelligent design|revolutionary theory]] but giving no concrete testable predictions." − − == Crank style == − Cranks often employ similar tactics during debate. These tactics may consist of, but are by no means limited to: − *Routinely ignores the finer points that are prerequisite to understanding the mainstream theory. − *Failure to use standard methods of notation or [[Baraminology#Baraminological_Terms|terminology]]. − *Attempt to redefine [[Creation Museum|established terminology]]. − *Ignore all evidence that is presented that contradicts their own hypothesis. − − == Quotations == − “A crank is someone with a new idea -- until it catches on.” - [[Mark Twain]] − − == References == − <references/>
Reverted edits by DonnyC (talk) to last revision by CPalmer
“A person with a new idea is a crank until the idea succeeds.” - [[Mark Twain]]
[[Category:Psychology]]
[[Category:Psychology]]