Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 42: Line 42:  
::::So what happened to explanation of the supposedly "glaring" logical claw in the above-stated defect in the formula?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:37, 15 June 2015 (EDT)
 
::::So what happened to explanation of the supposedly "glaring" logical claw in the above-stated defect in the formula?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:37, 15 June 2015 (EDT)
   −
Even a "true formula" not necessarily leads to "anything of value". "Leading to something of value" therefore doesn't say anything about "the correctness of the formula". --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:01, 15 June 2015 (EDT)
+
Even a "true formula" not necessarily leads to "anything of value". "Not leading to anything of value" therefore doesn't say anything about "the correctness of the formula". --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:01, 15 June 2015 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu