Changes

:::Of course it's more fun (easier too)! It's a lot easier to construct a simple ''modus tollens'', than it is to wade through some really difficult math. It's even easier when you affirm the consequent or beg the question with your premises.--[[User:DonnyC|DonnyC]] 02:15, 15 June 2015 (EDT)

:::Of course it's more fun (easier too)! It's a lot easier to construct a simple ''modus tollens'', than it is to wade through some really difficult math. It's even easier when you affirm the consequent or beg the question with your premises.--[[User:DonnyC|DonnyC]] 02:15, 15 June 2015 (EDT)

::::So what happened to explanation of the supposedly "glaring" logical claw in the above-stated defect in the formula?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:37, 15 June 2015 (EDT)

::::So what happened to explanation of the supposedly "glaring" logical flaw in the above-stated defect in the formula?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:37, 15 June 2015 (EDT)

Even a "true formula" not necessarily leads to "anything of value". "Not leading to anything of value" therefore doesn't say anything about "the correctness of the formula". --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:01, 15 June 2015 (EDT)

Even a "true formula" not necessarily leads to "anything of value". "Not leading to anything of value" therefore doesn't say anything about "the correctness of the formula". --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:01, 15 June 2015 (EDT)