SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + + + + + + +
Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)
Revision as of 04:16, June 16, 2015
, 04:16, June 16, 2015Rejecting experimental science.
:::::::August, I don't have the data from the experiment, and I wasn't there. But I don't doubt that an experiment can probably be developed, just as a broken clock can be found, to give a desired result or (in the case of a clock) a correct time of day. The meaning of such an experiment is nothing, particularly for a logically flawed hypothesis.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:40, 15 June 2015 (EDT)
:::::::August, I don't have the data from the experiment, and I wasn't there. But I don't doubt that an experiment can probably be developed, just as a broken clock can be found, to give a desired result or (in the case of a clock) a correct time of day. The meaning of such an experiment is nothing, particularly for a logically flawed hypothesis.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:40, 15 June 2015 (EDT)
::::::::Andy, you seem to be saying that you do not accept experimental science. "An experiment can probably be developed, just as a broken clock can be found, to give a desired result." Really? Are you saying that one can get any desired result just be fudging experimental data long enough? Are you saying that the fact that you weren't present when the original Cockcroft and Walton experiment was performed makes it suspect? Have you considered going to a local college or industrial physics laboratory and asking them to perform the experiment before your very eyes?
::::::::Do you really reject experimental science?
::::::::Are you saying that, because you believe, without being able to make a convincing argument for it, that the equation is "logically flawed", no experiment confirming it can be trusted? Are you saying that the entire scientific community can't be trusted? Are you saying that the Cockcroft and Walton experiment was not performed? Or that it was performed but it got different results, that Cockcroft and Walton are concealing? That the Nobel Prize committee was in error in awarding the prize? That all nuclear scientists in the world are deceived, and only you know about this? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:16, 16 June 2015 (EDT)
*All the necessary data of the experiment is listed at [[Talk:E=mc²#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton]]. Please answer the questions.
*All the necessary data of the experiment is listed at [[Talk:E=mc²#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton]]. Please answer the questions.