Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 114: Line 114:     
:::I often have a hard time following your writing.  Two possible explanations are that English is not your first language, or that you get carried away by your attempts to show great erudition in your writing.  There is much evidence strongly pointing to the latter.  I will assume that, by "completeness of the absence" you mean "complete absence", for example, and that what you are saying is that your lucid and penetrating exposition of how science works was not included in the "rebuttal" essay, and that the latter is poorer for that.  I can assure you that I knew exactly what I was doing when I wrote the essay.  I also have a fairly good understanding of how measurement error works, how calculus works, how experimental physics works, and how experiments have historically obtained ever more precise confirmations of Boyle's law, Charles' law, Galilean physics, Newtonian physics, the law of definite proportions, Maxwell's equations, Planck's formula, Schrödinger's equation, relativity, E=mc^2, and so on and so forth.  These things, and their history, can be found in many physics textbooks and encyclopedias.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:46, 30 June 2015 (EDT)
 
:::I often have a hard time following your writing.  Two possible explanations are that English is not your first language, or that you get carried away by your attempts to show great erudition in your writing.  There is much evidence strongly pointing to the latter.  I will assume that, by "completeness of the absence" you mean "complete absence", for example, and that what you are saying is that your lucid and penetrating exposition of how science works was not included in the "rebuttal" essay, and that the latter is poorer for that.  I can assure you that I knew exactly what I was doing when I wrote the essay.  I also have a fairly good understanding of how measurement error works, how calculus works, how experimental physics works, and how experiments have historically obtained ever more precise confirmations of Boyle's law, Charles' law, Galilean physics, Newtonian physics, the law of definite proportions, Maxwell's equations, Planck's formula, Schrödinger's equation, relativity, E=mc^2, and so on and so forth.  These things, and their history, can be found in many physics textbooks and encyclopedias.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:46, 30 June 2015 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Would you say that from my indentation choice that possibly I was not speaking to you, but to AugustO and his comments that he linked to at the top of this page? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] 01:02, 30 June 2015 (EDT)
    
== Just a tip... ==
 
== Just a tip... ==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,697

edits

Navigation menu