SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 116:
Line 116: + + + + + +
Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)
Revision as of 05:18, June 30, 2015
, 05:18, June 30, 2015→Conspiracy Theory
::Would you say that from my indentation choice that possibly I was not speaking to you, but to AugustO and his comments that he linked to at the top of this page? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] 01:02, 30 June 2015 (EDT)
::Would you say that from my indentation choice that possibly I was not speaking to you, but to AugustO and his comments that he linked to at the top of this page? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] 01:02, 30 June 2015 (EDT)
:::No, I don't think you were, though I could be wrong. Your reference to "your supposedly critical webpage" seemed to me to be about the "rebuttal" page. The usual standards of indentation, if followed carefully, would suggest that you were replying to your own "Lol" remark, which I assumed you were not actually doing, so I did not read a great deal into your indentation.
:::It's true that AugustO has also written a good deal about relativity, E=mc^2, and the Cockcroft-Walton experiment. But the comments he linked to at the top of this page (the Aschlafly questions that he put on the E=mc^2 talk page) are not "[his] supposedly critical webpage".
:::Here's an idea: Why don't you tell us whom your remarks were aimed at? [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 01:18, 30 June 2015 (EDT)
== Just a tip... ==
== Just a tip... ==