Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,135
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 320:
Line 320: + + + + + +
→Advice on dealing with an egregious attack on arbitration: new section
:Thanks. I'm currently doing this on an ad-hoc basis, but I can zip up the RSS posts for the edits I do have (which is incomplete) and send it to you. [[User:GregG|GregG]] ([[User talk:GregG|talk]]) 10:58, 26 August 2015 (EDT)
:Thanks. I'm currently doing this on an ad-hoc basis, but I can zip up the RSS posts for the edits I do have (which is incomplete) and send it to you. [[User:GregG|GregG]] ([[User talk:GregG|talk]]) 10:58, 26 August 2015 (EDT)
::That would be wonderful! I can then do the rest.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 11:03, 26 August 2015 (EDT)
::That would be wonderful! I can then do the rest.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 11:03, 26 August 2015 (EDT)
== Advice on dealing with an egregious attack on arbitration ==
Hi Andy,
I just came across this [http://www.commdiginews.com/business-2/forced-arbitration-license-to-steal-47611/ diatribe on arbitration]. As you might pick up from reading the rant, it contains numerous disparaging falsehoods about how arbitration works. Although the author provided contact information at the bottom of his editorial, I'm not sure how useful it would be to offer him in-depth corrections of all the misunderstandings his post exhibits. What are your thoughts on dealing with this? Thanks, [[User:GregG|GregG]] ([[User talk:GregG|talk]]) 23:00, 3 September 2015 (EDT)