22
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − '''[[Perfection]]''' can be quantified just as height, weight, speech, intelligence, and other attributes are quantified, though perhaps not as easily. In the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], the author (possibly [[Jesus]]) emphasized the significance of perfection. In logical thought it as substantial importance also. But how should one quantify it?+ − − == Quantifying Perfection in Golf == − − What would be a "perfect" round of golf? Currently golf games are quantified with a higher number representing poorer performance. How could it be quantified such that a "100" represents a perfect round of 18 holes? − − One approach is to say that a perfect round of golf would be a hole-in-one on every hole. But that is an impossible round of golf, and something unattainable would be a poor definition of perfection. − − == Quantifying Perfection in Football == − − What would be a perfect game played by a team in football? − == See also == − *[[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]
Essay:Quantifying Perfection (view source)
Revision as of 20:37, October 4, 2015
, 20:37, October 4, 2015Replaced content with "Whatever Andrew Schlafly says it is. He's the new pope."
Whatever Andrew Schlafly says it is. He's the new pope.