Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − Whatever Andrew Schlafly says it is. He's the new pope.+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
Essay:Quantifying Perfection (view source)
Revision as of 20:38, October 4, 2015
, 20:38, October 4, 2015Undo revision 1174028 by Sensational (talk)
'''[[Perfection]]''' can be quantified just as height, weight, speech, intelligence, and other attributes are quantified, though perhaps not as easily. In the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], the author (possibly [[Jesus]]) emphasized the significance of perfection. In logical thought it as substantial importance also. But how should one quantify it?
== Quantifying Perfection in Golf ==
What would be a "perfect" round of golf? Currently golf games are quantified with a higher number representing poorer performance. How could it be quantified such that a "100" represents a perfect round of 18 holes?
One approach is to say that a perfect round of golf would be a hole-in-one on every hole. But that is an impossible round of golf, and something unattainable would be a poor definition of perfection.
== Quantifying Perfection in Football ==
What would be a perfect game played by a team in football?
== See also ==
*[[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]
(username removed)