36
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + +
Oh my!
::Oh Robin, so sensitive. I specialize in fact-free articles, void of reality. LOL, Nice try. Coloured, would that be British Conservative spelling? --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] ([[User talk:Jpatt|talk]]) 23:11, 12 November 2015 (EST)
::Oh Robin, so sensitive. I specialize in fact-free articles, void of reality. LOL, Nice try. Coloured, would that be British Conservative spelling? --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] ([[User talk:Jpatt|talk]]) 23:11, 12 November 2015 (EST)
:::Before I left work today, I was playfully mocked by my colleagues. The liberals couldn’t understand why I, a reasonable conservative, was even reading Conservapedia. And the conservatives by asking me why I’m wasting my time with a nonsense blog. I told them I was a sucker for punishment. One of my friends told me about your edit. I was embarrassed, so was she. Why use a reference from a fringe website that is over five years old? Your American Thinker article even mentioned the 14,000 broken turbines myth. Pathetic. I thought references should be of at least minimal quality. Funny how you can notice my occasional UK spelling, I’m well traveled my good sir, but then somehow miss the crappy content of your reference. Please notice I accused you of deleting factual information, not writing fact-free articles. That being said, your ‘facts’ leave a lot to be desired. --[[User:RobinBast|RobinBast]] ([[User talk:RobinBast|talk]]) 00:29, 13 November 2015 (EST)