Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,850
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + + + + +
→Deleted
:::Before I left work today, I was playfully mocked by my colleagues. The liberals couldn’t understand why I, a reasonable conservative, was even reading Conservapedia. And the conservatives by asking me why I’m wasting my time with a nonsense blog. I told them I was a sucker for punishment. One of my friends told me about your edit. I was embarrassed, so was she. Why use a reference from a fringe website that is over five years old? Your American Thinker article even mentioned the 14,000 broken turbines myth. Pathetic. I thought references should be of at least minimal quality. Funny how you can notice my occasional UK spelling, I’m well traveled my good sir, but then somehow miss the crappy content of your reference. Please notice I accused you of deleting factual information, not writing fact-free articles. That being said, your ‘facts’ leave a lot to be desired. --[[User:RobinBast|RobinBast]] ([[User talk:RobinBast|talk]]) 00:29, 13 November 2015 (EST)
:::Before I left work today, I was playfully mocked by my colleagues. The liberals couldn’t understand why I, a reasonable conservative, was even reading Conservapedia. And the conservatives by asking me why I’m wasting my time with a nonsense blog. I told them I was a sucker for punishment. One of my friends told me about your edit. I was embarrassed, so was she. Why use a reference from a fringe website that is over five years old? Your American Thinker article even mentioned the 14,000 broken turbines myth. Pathetic. I thought references should be of at least minimal quality. Funny how you can notice my occasional UK spelling, I’m well traveled my good sir, but then somehow miss the crappy content of your reference. Please notice I accused you of deleting factual information, not writing fact-free articles. That being said, your ‘facts’ leave a lot to be desired. --[[User:RobinBast|RobinBast]] ([[User talk:RobinBast|talk]]) 00:29, 13 November 2015 (EST)
I have big doubts about Wind Turbine Syndrome (may be nocebo effect which is a reverse placebo effect), but the subsidization of the wind energy makes me suspect that it is not economically viable.
I realize there are economic impacts of coal (health care cost and low of productivity due to health effects of pollution) and that nuclear power has risks. I suspect the public's fears associated with the various types of energy and people's resistance to change probably is adversely effecting optimal decisions to be made.
Unfortunately, liberal environmentalists are often guilty of needlessly stoking people's fears and conservatives sometimes reflexively resists change. For example, conservatives were laggards at internet fundraising for their political campaigns. 01:03, 13 November 2015 (EST)