SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 107:
Line 107: − +
Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 17:41, December 27, 2015
, 17:41, December 27, 2015"counterexamples to relativity" is up to 48.
|-
|-
|November 28, 2009<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=724599</ref>
|November 28, 2009<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=724599</ref>
|[[Counterexamples to Relativity]] prove that the theory is false.
|Conservapedia claims that the [[Theory of relativity]] is false, and creates the page [[Counterexamples to Relativity]], initially containing 10 purported counterexamples. By late 2015 the number will have grown to 48.
|a barrage of public criticism against anyone who even questions the unproven theory; no one seeking a PhD or tenure dare express doubts about the theory
|a barrage of public criticism against anyone who even questions the unproven theory; no one seeking a PhD or tenure dare express doubts about the theory
|A ''New Scientist'' article, entitled "Breaking relativity," declares that celestial signals defy the theory
|A ''New Scientist'' article, entitled "Breaking relativity," declares that celestial signals defy the theory