Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Conservapedia proven right (view source)

Revision as of 17:59, December 27, 2015

7 bytes added ,  17:59, December 27, 2015
copy edit to this: Conservapedia asserts that the Theory of relativity is false, and creates the page Counterexamples to Relativity, initially containing 10 counterexamples. By late 2015 the number will have grown to 48 counterexamples.
Line 107: Line 107:  
|-
 
|-
 
|November 28, 2009<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=724599</ref>
 
|November 28, 2009<ref>http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Relativity&oldid=724599</ref>
−
|Conservapedia claims that the [[Theory of relativity]] is false, and creates the page [[Counterexamples to Relativity]], initially containing 10 purported counterexamples.  By late 2015 the number will have grown to 48.
+
|Conservapedia asserts that the [[Theory of relativity]] is false, and creates the page [[Counterexamples to Relativity]], initially containing 10 counterexamples.  By late 2015 the number will have grown to 48 counterexamples.
 
|a barrage of public criticism against anyone who even questions the unproven theory; no one seeking a PhD or tenure dare express doubts about the theory
 
|a barrage of public criticism against anyone who even questions the unproven theory; no one seeking a PhD or tenure dare express doubts about the theory
 
|A ''New Scientist'' article, entitled "Breaking relativity," declares that celestial signals defy the theory
 
|A ''New Scientist'' article, entitled "Breaking relativity," declares that celestial signals defy the theory
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,565

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1189319"

Navigation menu