Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1,564: Line 1,564:  
:::A lot of Republicans will acquiesce if Trump becomes the nominee.  And Trump and the RNC have barely begun to challenge Hillary.  ''Nobody's'' challenged Sanders.  And if Trump articulates his vision well in the debates his numbers are bound to improve.  Plus the swing voters who don't consume conservative media will be hearing the arguments against Hillary for the first time, and there are a lot of negatives that can be said about her. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 06:12, 20 January 2016 (EST)
 
:::A lot of Republicans will acquiesce if Trump becomes the nominee.  And Trump and the RNC have barely begun to challenge Hillary.  ''Nobody's'' challenged Sanders.  And if Trump articulates his vision well in the debates his numbers are bound to improve.  Plus the swing voters who don't consume conservative media will be hearing the arguments against Hillary for the first time, and there are a lot of negatives that can be said about her. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 06:12, 20 January 2016 (EST)
 
::::There were other articles about the "establishment" backing Trump, but Rush Limbaugh suggested today it could be reverse psychology, in that the voters are supposed to be angry at the "establishment", and its association with Trump will cause him to lose votes.  If so, Limbaugh predicts they won't be able to maintain their support and will have to abandon Trump at some point. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 01:08, 21 January 2016 (EST)
 
::::There were other articles about the "establishment" backing Trump, but Rush Limbaugh suggested today it could be reverse psychology, in that the voters are supposed to be angry at the "establishment", and its association with Trump will cause him to lose votes.  If so, Limbaugh predicts they won't be able to maintain their support and will have to abandon Trump at some point. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 01:08, 21 January 2016 (EST)
 +
 +
== Cruz on the campaign trail ==
 +
 +
On the campaign trail in New Hampshire, ''The Washington Post'' is "terrified" of what an awesome vote-getting machine Cruz is: "[https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/what-makes-ted-cruz-truly-dangerous/2016/01/19/5f20dbee-bed8-11e5-bcda-62a36b394160_story.html?tid=pm_opinions_pop_b What makes Ted Cruz truly dangerous]." Sample zinger:
 +
*“For the record, Tom Brady was framed,” he says, to inevitable cheers about the Patriots quarterback. “I’m not willing to pander on much” — laughter — “but on that, Tom Brady was framed, and I have it on good authority that Hillary Clinton was responsible.” More cheers. “Why else do you think she destroyed her emails?” [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 04:37, 21 January 2016 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
14,282

edits

Navigation menu