SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 193:
Line 193: + +
Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)
Revision as of 03:06, February 22, 2016
, 03:06, February 22, 2016→Changing the Speed of Light
:::Are you saying that ''E=mc<sup>2</sup>'' requires that ''c'' remain absolutely unchanged throughout the lifetime of the universe? If so, then that proves my point, because that assumption is implausible.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:47, 21 February 2016 (EST)
:::Are you saying that ''E=mc<sup>2</sup>'' requires that ''c'' remain absolutely unchanged throughout the lifetime of the universe? If so, then that proves my point, because that assumption is implausible.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:47, 21 February 2016 (EST)
::::No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that I don't know what the consequences of a change in ''c'' would be. Relativity doesn't address that possibility. Nor do I know what the consequences of an increase in the atomic weight of Iron would be, but presumably Newton's law of motion, ''F=ma'' would have to adapt, so that it would take more force to get a given amount of acceleration of a given piece of Iron. I don't know what the consequences of that would be for the universe as a whole. But I doubt that it would overthrow ''F=ma''. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:06, 21 February 2016 (EST)