Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,697
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 195:
Line 195: +
Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)
Revision as of 01:27, February 23, 2016
, 01:27, February 23, 2016→Changing the Speed of Light: relativity on the brain
::::No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that I don't know what the consequences of a change in ''c'' would be. Relativity doesn't address that possibility. Nor do I know what the consequences of an increase in the atomic weight of Iron would be, but presumably Newton's law of motion, ''F=ma'' would have to adapt, so that it would take more force to get a given amount of acceleration of a given piece of Iron. I don't know what the consequences of that would be for the universe as a whole. But I doubt that it would overthrow ''F=ma''. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:06, 21 February 2016 (EST)
::::No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that I don't know what the consequences of a change in ''c'' would be. Relativity doesn't address that possibility. Nor do I know what the consequences of an increase in the atomic weight of Iron would be, but presumably Newton's law of motion, ''F=ma'' would have to adapt, so that it would take more force to get a given amount of acceleration of a given piece of Iron. I don't know what the consequences of that would be for the universe as a whole. But I doubt that it would overthrow ''F=ma''. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:06, 21 February 2016 (EST)
:::::What more evidence do we need of Sam having relativity on the brain? To him, not only is E=mc<sup>2</sup> an equation, he actually thinks it's a ''definition''. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 20:27, 22 February 2016 (EST)