Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Tree rings: new section
Line 9: Line 9:     
I therefore claim Claim 30 is not encyclopedic. [[User:PaulBurnett|PaulBurnett]] 23:38, 21 December 2009 (EST)
 
I therefore claim Claim 30 is not encyclopedic. [[User:PaulBurnett|PaulBurnett]] 23:38, 21 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
== Tree rings ==
 +
 +
The article says that "Tree rings, including rings on petrified forest trees, can't be traced back more than some thousands of years." This claim is not true. In some cases tree rings give an unbroken record back more than 11,000 years. [http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CG/CG010.html] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 15:24, 18 March 2016 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, rollback
7,537

edits

Navigation menu