Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,972
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: − + + + +
Atheists and the National Academy of Sciences (view source)
Revision as of 23:17, March 25, 2016
, 23:17, March 25, 2016no edit summary
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2009/03/if-you-hand-us-hammer.html Scientific fraud problem in science community]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2009/03/if-you-hand-us-hammer.html Scientific fraud problem in science community]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2013/10/peer-review-is-joke.html Peer review problems in science]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2013/10/peer-review-is-joke.html Peer review problems in science]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2013/10/science-has-lost-its-way.html Scientific replication problems and current published science articles]</ref>
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2013/10/science-has-lost-its-way.html Scientific replication problems and current published science articles]
*[http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248 Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test], ''Nature'', August 27, 2015
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/11/psychology-is-not-science.html Psychology is not science] - Discusses lack of transparency of Dutch psychologists in terms of their data for their experiments
</ref>
'''6.''' Atheists are well-known for their arrogance (see: [[Atheism and arrogance]]). Joining an elitist organization is naturally more appealing to arrogant individuals.
'''6.''' Atheists are well-known for their arrogance (see: [[Atheism and arrogance]]). Joining an elitist organization is naturally more appealing to arrogant individuals.