Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,956
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: − +
Atheists and the National Academy of Sciences (view source)
Revision as of 00:57, March 26, 2016
, 00:57, March 26, 2016no edit summary
However, they fail to point out:
However, they fail to point out:
'''1.''' Randal Rauser indicates:
'''1.''' Randal Rauser, an associate professor of historical theology at Taylor Seminary, indicates:
{{cquote|The study never asked about belief in God in general, but about belief in a very personal God who answers prayers and communicates actively and effectively with people. In other words, respondents didn’t comment on God in general, just this specific formulation of a very personal God. The questions would likely put many deists, as well as theists who tend to doubt people’s reports of God communicating directly with them, in the category of unbeliever...
{{cquote|The study never asked about belief in God in general, but about belief in a very personal God who answers prayers and communicates actively and effectively with people. In other words, respondents didn’t comment on God in general, just this specific formulation of a very personal God. The questions would likely put many deists, as well as theists who tend to doubt people’s reports of God communicating directly with them, in the category of unbeliever...