Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,956
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 90:
Line 90: − +
Atheists and the National Academy of Sciences (view source)
Revision as of 15:40, March 26, 2016
, 15:40, March 26, 2016→Logical fallacies committed: Category mistake and appeal to authority
''See also:'' [[Atheism and logical fallacies]] and [[Atheism and logic]]
''See also:'' [[Atheism and logical fallacies]] and [[Atheism and logic]]
[[Image:Bahnsen.jpg|thumb|250px|During his debate with Dr. Gordon Stein, [[Greg Bahnsen]] pointed out that the [[atheist worldview]] cannot account for the [[laws of logic]], but the Christian worldview can.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1hSx2evTGM Greg Bahnsen vs. Gordon Stein: The Great Debate (FULL)] </ref><ref>[http://veritasdomain.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/greg-bahnsen-vs-gordon-stein-the-great-debate/ "The Great Debate: Does God Exist?"]</ref>]]
Despite the poor survey design of the survey in question (which the atheist [[Eugenie C. Scott]] has acknowledged as noted above), atheist apologists commonly cite a survey of the religious beliefs of the scientists who are members of the [[National Academy of Sciences]] in order to justify their atheism.
Despite the poor survey design of the survey in question (which the atheist [[Eugenie C. Scott]] has acknowledged as noted above), atheist apologists commonly cite a survey of the religious beliefs of the scientists who are members of the [[National Academy of Sciences]] in order to justify their atheism.