Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: + +
happy medium
Still, you can't hope to fit hundreds or possibly thousands of sub-sections (however stubby they may be) for each country into an article that's got to be... 32K or thereabouts(?) in total size. --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 10:57, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
Still, you can't hope to fit hundreds or possibly thousands of sub-sections (however stubby they may be) for each country into an article that's got to be... 32K or thereabouts(?) in total size. --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 10:57, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
:I think 32K bytes is a good maximum size for an article. Anything over that should probably be divided into sections. On the other hand, anything under 100 words is probably too short to be an article. I'd prefer to see short, stubby pages merged together. Let's try to find a [[happy medium]] between the two extremes. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:26, 21 April 2007 (EDT)