nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781
edits
Changes
no edit summary
:I think 32K bytes is a good maximum size for an article. Anything over that should probably be divided into sections. On the other hand, anything under 100 words is probably too short to be an article. I'd prefer to see short, stubby pages merged together. Let's try to find a [[happy medium]] between the two extremes. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:26, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
:I think 32K bytes is a good maximum size for an article. Anything over that should probably be divided into sections. On the other hand, anything under 100 words is probably too short to be an article. I'd prefer to see short, stubby pages merged together. Let's try to find a [[happy medium]] between the two extremes. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:26, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
==Biscuit edit==
The entry about biscuits in culture probably doesn't have any place in Conservapedia, even if it goes over most people's heads. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 03:45, 22 April 2007 (EDT)