Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1,744: Line 1,744:  
Using the internet service provided by a hotel (Sheraton) recently, some Conservapedia pages were blocked for having "adult" (that is, not family-friendly) content.  I had not requested any kind of "parental control" setting.  The page [[Liberal denial]] really caught my attention.  It was accessible with one click from the front page.  I then looked around, and several other pages were also flagged.  All the pages like [[Bestiality and Sweden]] were of course flagged, but [[Liberal denial]], and a number of other "ordinary" pages, really surprised me.  ''This web site is rapidly becoming "adult" in nature'', and not just in the expected articles by [[User:Conservative]].  It's really frustrating to try to write articles about math and science if they, or perhaps the whole web site, is going to be blocked by the parental controls that might be enforced for the intended audience.  Would the administration of this web site please tell us what action is planned to remedy this situation?  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:38, 4 April 2016 (EDT)
 
Using the internet service provided by a hotel (Sheraton) recently, some Conservapedia pages were blocked for having "adult" (that is, not family-friendly) content.  I had not requested any kind of "parental control" setting.  The page [[Liberal denial]] really caught my attention.  It was accessible with one click from the front page.  I then looked around, and several other pages were also flagged.  All the pages like [[Bestiality and Sweden]] were of course flagged, but [[Liberal denial]], and a number of other "ordinary" pages, really surprised me.  ''This web site is rapidly becoming "adult" in nature'', and not just in the expected articles by [[User:Conservative]].  It's really frustrating to try to write articles about math and science if they, or perhaps the whole web site, is going to be blocked by the parental controls that might be enforced for the intended audience.  Would the administration of this web site please tell us what action is planned to remedy this situation?  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:38, 4 April 2016 (EDT)
 
:The Bible mentions bestiality multiple times. Do you want to ban the Bible? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:51, 4 April 2016 (EDT)
 
:The Bible mentions bestiality multiple times. Do you want to ban the Bible? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:51, 4 April 2016 (EDT)
 +
::I have zero tolerance for that kind of childish and disingenuous excuse.  It's the kind of excuse that I used on my parents to defend my use of foul language.  I'm sure most people did the same.  But we stopped by the time we reached the age of 10 or so.  And you should too.  There are things in the Bible that one should not be obsessive about.  And no books of the Bible have that word in any of its book titles.  Yet Conservapedia is quite obsessed with it: [[Professor values and bestiality]], [[Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant]], [[Bestiality and various geographic areas]], [[Bestiality and Germany]], [[Atheism and bestiality]], [[Wikipedia on bestiality]], [[Academia and bestiality]], [[Denmark and bestiality]], [[Bestiality and Sweden]], [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]], [[Netherlands and bestiality]], [[Bestiality and Denmark, Sweden, and evolutionary belief]], [[Bestiality and atheism]].  It's time for you to stop acting as though the rest of us want to play these childish games.  We don't.  We haven't since we were 10 years old.  These games are causing Conservapedia, a web site that many of us seriously care about, to trigger content-blocking software.
 +
 +
::But thanks for removing the "Being a proponent of [[liberal Christianity]], it wouldn't surprise me if you want to ban the Bible!" ''ad hominem''.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:57, 4 April 2016 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266

edits

Navigation menu