Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
New section: /* 2016 Republican National Convention
Line 1,812: Line 1,812:     
:Conservative, I think the Baylor study you cited has thrown this type of statistics gathering into an uproar.  A Christian asked, "Do you have a religious preference?" might answer, "No, I'm non-denominational" or "No, I just have a personal relationship with Christ", skewing the results.  [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 00:54, 12 April 2016 (EDT)
 
:Conservative, I think the Baylor study you cited has thrown this type of statistics gathering into an uproar.  A Christian asked, "Do you have a religious preference?" might answer, "No, I'm non-denominational" or "No, I just have a personal relationship with Christ", skewing the results.  [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 00:54, 12 April 2016 (EDT)
 +
 +
== 2016 Republican National Convention ==
 +
 +
I just saw a rerun of some of the 2012 Republican National Convention which led me to believe that this year's convention is going to be a zoo.  Delegates of both parties are such ham bones that even when there are little to no debatable issues, especially as far as who will be the candidate, there are various cheering sections all around the convention floor for certain pet issues and state loyalties.  I can imagine speakers this year having each and every sentence in their speeches scrutinized by the delegates and responded to with either cheers or boos—and cheers or boos increasing on each successive occasion—to denounce or praise the issue being discussed in hopes of giving either Trump, Cruz or Kasich the edge they need to push them over the top. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 02:26, 12 April 2016 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,708

edits

Navigation menu