Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
→‎Copyright: extra word
Line 1,855: Line 1,855:  
Need I go on?  Just to be clear, I am not posting this just to complain, but to try to be helpful.  Have a great day! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 14:40, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
 
Need I go on?  Just to be clear, I am not posting this just to complain, but to try to be helpful.  Have a great day! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 14:40, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
 
==Copyright==
 
==Copyright==
−
Many of us have been spending most of the past month trying to clean up after TAR.  The fact that so many copyright problems have been left behind indicates that Conservapedia editors may not be appreciate the importance of copyright law.  The edit box always displays the statement "You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Conservapedia:Copyrights for details). '''Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!'''"  Permission means an agreement not only to place the text on Conservapedia, but also to license it to others on the same basis that all other Conservapedia content is licensed.  In some cases, TAR just copied and pasted from other websites without attributing the content to them.  In other cases, TAR copied large portions of text that a blog had quoted from another source.  I would suggest that everyone take the time to read [[Conservapedia:Copyrights]] again.  I also believe that we need more talk page templates to document when people have received permission to copy material.  I assume that getting written permissions would be best, and that they should be stored in some central place, just in case misunderstanding occur in the future.  [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 08:46, 24 April 2016 (EDT)
+
Many of us have been spending most of the past month trying to clean up after TAR.  The fact that so many copyright problems have been left behind indicates that Conservapedia editors may not appreciate the importance of copyright law.  The edit box always displays the statement "You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Conservapedia:Copyrights for details). '''Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!'''"  Permission means an agreement not only to place the text on Conservapedia, but also to license it to others on the same basis that all other Conservapedia content is licensed.  In some cases, TAR just copied and pasted from other websites without attributing the content to them.  In other cases, TAR copied large portions of text that a blog had quoted from another source.  I would suggest that everyone take the time to read [[Conservapedia:Copyrights]] again.  I also believe that we need more talk page templates to document when people have received permission to copy material.  I assume that getting written permissions would be best, and that they should be stored in some central place, just in case misunderstanding occur in the future.  [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 08:46, 24 April 2016 (EDT)
    
== Please unlock ==
 
== Please unlock ==
    
Please unlock the [[Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity]] page.  I need to reinstate (uncomment) item #22, to track the reinstated item #22 in the main counterexamples page.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:00, 24 April 2016 (EDT)
 
Please unlock the [[Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity]] page.  I need to reinstate (uncomment) item #22, to track the reinstated item #22 in the main counterexamples page.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:00, 24 April 2016 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
3,995

edits

Navigation menu