Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,826
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 62:
Line 62: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 07:14, June 5, 2016
, 07:14, June 5, 2016no edit summary
::Well spoken, David. Speak of what you know; not of what some website wants you to believe. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 02:57, 26 May 2016 (EDT)
::Well spoken, David. Speak of what you know; not of what some website wants you to believe. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 02:57, 26 May 2016 (EDT)
== One column footnoting vs. two column footnoting and mobile devices ==
For this article [[Operation Compass]] I added footnoting code at the bottom of the article for the new editor.
If you look at the article, you will see that the footnoting is one column footnoting and not two column footnoting.
I think I recall reading that one column footnoting is better for mobile device readers, but I am not sure. Do you know if this is the case or not?
Also, if you look at my edit which is [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Operation_Compass&diff=1224027&oldid=1224024 HERE], you will see that my column width is colwidth=30em . I think this might be better for mobile devices as well, but I am not sure.
If I am right about these two matters, I think Conservapedia's manual of style should be updated. Also, we might want to clean up our most high traffic articles so one column format is used.
Does anyone know about these matters? I ask because a lot of people are using mobile devices now. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:11, 5 June 2016 (EDT)