Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes removed ,  17:34, June 30, 2016
→‎top: Spelling, Grammar, and General Cleanup
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''[[Love]] and [[Justice]]'''<ref> [http://spectator.org/archives/2006/12/06/justice-and-love "Justice and Love"], ''The [[American Spectator]]'''s blog by Lisa Fabrizio, posted 12.6.06 @ 12:07AM </ref> are two principles that govern social order<ref> [[Emil Brunner]], "Some Remarks on Reinhold Niebuhr's work as a Christian thinker", pages 84-85 in ''[[Reinhold Niebuhr]]: his religious, social and political thought'', Charles W. Kegley (ed.), The Pilgrim Press, 1984, 2nd. Ed. </ref>.   In [[Christianity]] '''Love''' is the supreme principle. In the secular world assertions about [[Justice]] and its practical forms in governmental ''laws'' oftentimes ignore and sometimes even refute [[Christianity]]'s claims about the supreme importance of '''[[Love]]'''. '''Love''' and '''Justice''' may be seen as alternative or interacting philosophical systems.
+
'''[[Love]] and [[Justice]]'''<ref>[http://spectator.org/archives/2006/12/06/justice-and-love "Justice and Love"], ''The [[American Spectator]]'''s blog by Lisa Fabrizio, posted 12.6.06 @ 12:07AM</ref> are two principles that govern social order.<ref>[[Emil Brunner]], "Some Remarks on Reinhold Niebuhr's work as a Christian thinker", pages 84-85 in ''[[Reinhold Niebuhr]]: his religious, social and political thought'', Charles W. Kegley (ed.), The Pilgrim Press, 1984, 2nd. Ed.</ref>  In [[Christianity]] '''Love''' is the supreme principle. In the secular world assertions about [[Justice]] and its practical forms in governmental ''laws'' oftentimes ignore and sometimes even refute [[Christianity]]'s claims about the supreme importance of '''[[Love]]'''. '''Love''' and '''Justice''' may be seen as alternative or interacting philosophical systems.
    
==References==
 
==References==
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,439

edits

Navigation menu