| Line 111: |
Line 111: |
| | |Not as [[liberal]] as most American newspapers, and a good source of Latin American news. | | |Not as [[liberal]] as most American newspapers, and a good source of Latin American news. |
| | |-} | | |-} |
| − |
| |
| − | == Nominations ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Tentative placement (high ranking, medium ranking, low ranking) in parentheses, suggestions welcome:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *americanthinker.com (medium-to-low, not much on social issues)
| |
| − | *biggovernment.com
| |
| − | *bighollywood.com
| |
| − | *bigjournalism.com
| |
| − | *bigpeace.com
| |
| − | *[http://www.boycottliberalism.com/ BoycottLiberalism.com] Don't Buy Liberalism
| |
| − | *breitbart.com (low, much of it repeating liberal news sources; political coverage dominated by foreign policy issues)
| |
| − | *breitbart.tv
| |
| − | *canadafreepress.com
| |
| − | *catholicedition.com (has lots of quantity not allowed by [[lamestream media]])
| |
| − | *climateaudit.org (medium, but high quality on global warming issues)
| |
| − | *cnsnews.com (high, especially for news censored by [[lamestream media]], but it does not update news as frequently as other top sites)
| |
| − | *[http://www.the-manumitter.com/ The Daily Manumitter]- Conservative News of the world on one page
| |
| − | *examiner.com (high)
| |
| − | *[[Fox News]] (low, but high volume)
| |
| − | *[http://www.youtube.com/user/GeraldCelenteChannel Gerald Celente YouTube channel] (respects US Constitution, anti-[[Federal Reserve]], limited government, against bailouts and stimulus, pro-capitalism, predicted [[Tea Party Movement]] and the Great Recession, against USA being entangled in wars capriciously)
| |
| − | *frontpagemag.com
| |
| − | *hotair.com (medium)
| |
| − | *humanevents.com
| |
| − | *intellectualconservative.com
| |
| − | *lesswrong.com (mid to high, a very vibrant site, with thought provoking articles and essays on rationality and thought. Does not focus on social issues, but when it does, it is quite liberal on them.)
| |
| − | *lifenews.com (high quality, high volume; reports on social issues better than anyone)
| |
| − | *mediaite.com
| |
| − | *michellemalkin.com (high or medium)
| |
| − | *moonbattery.com
| |
| − | *nationalreview.com
| |
| − | *[[NewsBusters]] (medium)
| |
| − | *newsmax.com (medium)
| |
| − | *pajamasmedia.com
| |
| − | *politicsdaily.com
| |
| − | *rasmussenreports.com (high or medium, but high quality poll statistics)
| |
| − | *redstate.com (medium)
| |
| − | *rightwingnews.com (low due to crass and vulgar style)
| |
| − | *rushlimbaugh.com (medium or low, but high volume/quality conservative radio transcripts)
| |
| − | *sepp.org (medium, but high quality on global warming issues)
| |
| − | *spectator.com
| |
| − | *snopes.com (mid-low focuses on lies and drama from the internet social networking sites. Best source for debunking rumours and urban legends)
| |
| − | *[http://teapartyeconomist.com/ Tea Party Economist]
| |
| − | *thedailycaller.com
| |
| − | *[[thehill.com]]
| |
| − | *[http://washingtonexaminer.com/ Washington Examiner]
| |
| − | *[http://freebeacon.com/ Washington Free Beacon]
| |
| − | *Wall Street Journal
| |
| − | *Weekly Standard
| |
| − | *[http://www.newswithviews.com/ News With Views]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Other sources:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *Realclearpolitics (detailed polling about upcoming congressional elections)
| |
| | | | |
| | == Criteria == | | == Criteria == |