Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,629
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 56:
Line 56: − +
Conservapedia talk:Attribution (view source)
Revision as of 17:35, April 24, 2007
, 17:35, April 24, 2007→I think if you look at Rob's protection or torture you'll see what he means: What would you do?
::''.. ABC News has been told by former and current intelligence officers and supervisors....All gave their accounts on the condition that their names and identities not be revealed... detainees were also forced to listen to rap artist Eminem's "Slim Shady" album. The music was so foreign to them it made them frantic, sources said....The CIA sources described a list...''
::''.. ABC News has been told by former and current intelligence officers and supervisors....All gave their accounts on the condition that their names and identities not be revealed... detainees were also forced to listen to rap artist Eminem's "Slim Shady" album. The music was so foreign to them it made them frantic, sources said....The CIA sources described a list...''
:The question now is, this '''must be attributed to anonymous CIA sources''' and not simply ''ABC News''. Secondly, I would proposes Brian Ross and Richard Espisito also be held accountable as sources of these claims because of this, and ''other'' controversial material in the article. Thirdly, simply citing to "anonymous CIA sources" presents problems in itself as an unwarranted credible source. And fouth, ''ABC News'' past record of must also be taken into consideration.
:The question now is, this '''must be attributed to anonymous CIA sources''' and not simply ''ABC News''. Secondly, I would proposes Brian Ross and Richard Espisito also be held accountable as sources of these claims, because of this, and ''other'' controversial material in their article. Thirdly, simply citing to "anonymous CIA sources" presents problems in itself, as a possibly unwarranted and non-credible source. And fouth, ''ABC News'' past record of credibility must also be taken into consideration.
:So, for the claim "according to ''ABC News''", (a) how would you rephrase that properly, and (b) how can we phrase a guideline to deal with future problematic citations to possibly questionable sources for extremely controversial and inflamitory claims? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:32, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:So, for the claim "according to ''ABC News''", (a) how would you rephrase that properly, and (b) how can we phrase a guideline to deal with future problematic citations to possibly questionable sources for extremely controversial and inflamitory claims? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:32, 24 April 2007 (EDT)