343
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 223:
Line 223: + + + + + +
→Terryeo: The reason I will remove some of the JoyousOne's editing in the article
:::Its a wiki, we encourage editing! [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]]
:::Its a wiki, we encourage editing! [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]]
The User who calls themselves "JoyousOne" has clearly not understood the situation with this wiki. We do encourage editing. But we edit responsibily toward articles that are factual. The Conservapedia Commandments [[The_Conservapedia_Commandments]] and in particular, Commandment 1 which says that your edit must be verifiable. Your editing produced, "and avoiding any mention of faith's ability to help the individual." Yet Hubbard addresses that exact issue in various of his lectures. But it is not my duty to prove this to you. It is your duty to edit responsibily. Your edits must be verifiable. Commandment 2 spells that out, it says, "Always cite and give credit to your sources". I will remove those of your edits that are not verified and which I, through my own personal knowledge, are untrue. But any editor who is responsible should do that, anyway.
You went on to produce, "The basis of Christianity is denied", yet you fail to attribute WHERE the basis of Christianity is denied. Now, I could tell you personally about the many Christians I personally know who are Scientologists. But I won't, instead I will remove your unattributable statement, "The basis of Christianity is denied" because I know that you will never be able to attribute that to any Scientology statement. Probably what has happened is that you have read a critical - to - scientology website that says something like that. But that isn't what Scientology says. If you find such a statement and wish to present it as "Controvery", well, no one is going to stop you, but you are mistaken to say that the Church of Scientology "denies the basis of Christianity".
I'm sure you see where I'm going with this. First, edit responsibly by reading [[The Conservapedia Commandments]]. Second, your edits must be verifiable information. Third, cite your sources so that a reader of the article can learn more about what you are talking about. And welcome to Conservapedia.However, such editing is to be toward ariticles of a certain quality. John Smith could not become an editor and the wiki to place is opinion. This is exactly what JoyousUser has done, Joyous User has '''PLACED AN OPINION''' as an edit. This is what the wiki discourages, while encouraging editing. Please read