Changes

: Defend myself?  Defend myself against what? I have posted a full view of your attack against me on my user page and have raised your underhanded "question"  [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia_Talk#Can.27t_we_all_just_get_along.3F here].  Why weren't you were unable to ask the general community about standard editing policy and get the concensus of the editing community as I did in that link ?  Happy Ho Ho's. -[[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 19:15, 23 April 2007 (EDT)

: Defend myself?  Defend myself against what? I have posted a full view of your attack against me on my user page and have raised your underhanded "question"  [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia_Talk#Can.27t_we_all_just_get_along.3F here].  Why weren't you were unable to ask the general community about standard editing policy and get the concensus of the editing community as I did in that link ?  Happy Ho Ho's. -[[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 19:15, 23 April 2007 (EDT)

::Am I allowed to change the page at all, because right now it is really bad.  It doesn't tell all the weird stuff about the cult.[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 22:12, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

 

Am I allowed to change the page at all, because right now it is really bad.  It doesn't tell all the weird stuff about the cult.[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 22:12, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

:::Its a wiki, we encourage editing! [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]]

:::Its a wiki, we encourage editing! [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]]

You went on to produce, "The basis of Christianity is denied", yet you fail to attribute WHERE the basis of Christianity is denied.  Now, I could tell you personally about the many Christians I personally know who are Scientologists.  But I won't, instead I will remove your unattributable statement, "The basis of Christianity is denied" because I know that you will never be able to attribute that to any Scientology statement.  Probably what has happened is that you have read a critical - to - scientology website that says something like that.  But that isn't what Scientology says.  If you find such a statement and wish to present it as "Controvery", well, no one is going to stop you, but you are mistaken to say that the Church of Scientology "denies the basis of Christianity".

You went on to produce, "The basis of Christianity is denied", yet you fail to attribute WHERE the basis of Christianity is denied.  Now, I could tell you personally about the many Christians I personally know who are Scientologists.  But I won't, instead I will remove your unattributable statement, "The basis of Christianity is denied" because I know that you will never be able to attribute that to any Scientology statement.  Probably what has happened is that you have read a critical - to - scientology website that says something like that.  But that isn't what Scientology says.  If you find such a statement and wish to present it as "Controvery", well, no one is going to stop you, but you are mistaken to say that the Church of Scientology "denies the basis of Christianity".

I'm sure you see where I'm going with this.  First, edit responsibly by reading [[The Conservapedia Commandments]].  Second, your edits must be verifiable information.  Third, cite your sources so that a reader of the article can learn more about what you are talking about.  And welcome to Conservapedia.However, such editing is to be toward ariticles of a certain quality.  John Smith could not become an editor and the wiki to place is opinion.  This is exactly what JoyousUser has done, Joyous User has '''PLACED AN OPINION''' as an edit.  This is what the wiki discourages, while encouraging editing. Please read

I'm sure you see where I'm going with this.  First, edit responsibly by reading [[The Conservapedia Commandments]].  Second, your edits must be verifiable information.  Third, cite your sources so that a reader of the article can learn more about what you are talking about.  And welcome to Conservapedia.However, such editing is to be toward ariticles of a certain quality.  John Smith could not become an editor and the wiki to place is opinion.  This is exactly what JoyousUser has done, Joyous User has '''PLACED AN OPINION''' as an edit.  This is what the wiki discourages, while encouraging editing. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 00:27, 25 April 2007 (EDT)