Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
504 bytes added ,  04:40, July 22, 2016
m
Credit where it's due.
Line 280: Line 280:  
::::Any time! I'm a bit too tired to look it over right now, but I'll try to take a closer look in the morning.  --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 01:20, 19 July 2016 (EDT)
 
::::Any time! I'm a bit too tired to look it over right now, but I'll try to take a closer look in the morning.  --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 01:20, 19 July 2016 (EDT)
 
::::Also, Thanks for your continuing contributions! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 01:34, 19 July 2016 (EDT)
 
::::Also, Thanks for your continuing contributions! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 01:34, 19 July 2016 (EDT)
 +
 +
Nice job purging that vandal!  I don't get why trolls (liberal and otherwise) think they can vandalize this site with any efficacy when all they have to do is look at the recent changes section to show it ain't going to work.  I will say this about PayPal though: they're a liberal organization that can literally take away all your money in their system for no reason under their Terms of Use.  That's why I direct-deposit anything I earn on eBay immediately. --Pious (talk) 23:39, 21 July 2016 (CDT)
 +
 
==Spam==
 
==Spam==
 
There are very many mediawiki websites.  Many are neglected over time and become targets for spammers.  They are trying to build up their google search rankings rather than getting customers from the reader base of the target website.  So, they create articles with long improbable titles and hope that they stay up long enough to be discovered by the search engines.  Both Wikipedia and Conservapedia use "no follow" tags, but I am not clear that the search engine spiders ignore the links completely.  That is, a spider might not visit the linked website, but might still add to its count for links it found to that domain name.  In last night's case, the lonked domain name was youtube.com, so it really does not matter.  The point is that once people discover that a wiki is "open" and unmonitored, they start swarming in, including using bots.
 
There are very many mediawiki websites.  Many are neglected over time and become targets for spammers.  They are trying to build up their google search rankings rather than getting customers from the reader base of the target website.  So, they create articles with long improbable titles and hope that they stay up long enough to be discovered by the search engines.  Both Wikipedia and Conservapedia use "no follow" tags, but I am not clear that the search engine spiders ignore the links completely.  That is, a spider might not visit the linked website, but might still add to its count for links it found to that domain name.  In last night's case, the lonked domain name was youtube.com, so it really does not matter.  The point is that once people discover that a wiki is "open" and unmonitored, they start swarming in, including using bots.
SkipCaptcha
250

edits

Navigation menu