Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 42:
Line 42: +
Conservapedia talk:Evolution two (view source)
Revision as of 14:39, April 25, 2007
, 14:39, April 25, 2007→Illustrations
What I'd like to have are two illustrations per subheading, one for evolution, and one for creation. All illustrations should be as informative as possible, and should be complimentary in nature (not insulting). To introduce the article, I propose a piece of art by Albrecht Durer or Michaelangelo (creation), and an illustration from Darwin's book which shows a chain (such as Darwin's finches). [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:05, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
What I'd like to have are two illustrations per subheading, one for evolution, and one for creation. All illustrations should be as informative as possible, and should be complimentary in nature (not insulting). To introduce the article, I propose a piece of art by Albrecht Durer or Michaelangelo (creation), and an illustration from Darwin's book which shows a chain (such as Darwin's finches). [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:05, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:I've never liked using Michaelangelo's picture of creation. By its age, it gives the impression that creation is a dated concept. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:52, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:I've never liked using Michaelangelo's picture of creation. By its age, it gives the impression that creation is a dated concept. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:52, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::It's not set in stone yet, but that particular one is appropriate for the intro. There's one floating about which I have seen years ago in a family Bible, in which God is standing in the clouds with one upraised arm as light is created. I would love that one, but I don't know the artist. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:39, 25 April 2007 (EDT)