Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 43:
Line 43: + + +
Conservapedia talk:Evolution two (view source)
Revision as of 16:40, April 25, 2007
, 16:40, April 25, 2007no edit summary
:I've never liked using Michaelangelo's picture of creation. By its age, it gives the impression that creation is a dated concept. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:52, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:I've never liked using Michaelangelo's picture of creation. By its age, it gives the impression that creation is a dated concept. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:52, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::It's not set in stone yet, but that particular one is appropriate for the intro. There's one floating about which I have seen years ago in a family Bible, in which God is standing in the clouds with one upraised arm as light is created. I would love that one, but I don't know the artist. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:39, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
::It's not set in stone yet, but that particular one is appropriate for the intro. There's one floating about which I have seen years ago in a family Bible, in which God is standing in the clouds with one upraised arm as light is created. I would love that one, but I don't know the artist. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:39, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
==References==
On this particular reference, ''Philosophie zoologique ou exposition des considérations relatives à l'histoire naturelle des animaux (1809)'', can you provide an English title, author (obviously Lamarck), and last publication status, similar to the book listed below? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:40, 25 April 2007 (EDT)