| Line 51: |
Line 51: |
| | | | |
| | SlimVirgin then rewrote Official Wikipedia Reliable Sources Policy to make Berlet mainstream.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rangerdude/Workshop#Request_of_finding_for_ex_post_facto_policy_changes] Brandt and Berlet had worked together for many years, but had a falling out in 1991, and Brandt was being quoted as an anonymous critic in Berlet's wiki bio, | | SlimVirgin then rewrote Official Wikipedia Reliable Sources Policy to make Berlet mainstream.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rangerdude/Workshop#Request_of_finding_for_ex_post_facto_policy_changes] Brandt and Berlet had worked together for many years, but had a falling out in 1991, and Brandt was being quoted as an anonymous critic in Berlet's wiki bio, |
| − | :“one [[leftist]] writer mentions Berlet’s “crusade” against Progressives who stray from Berlet's ideological fever swamps [http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=10352] | + | :“one [[leftist]] writer mentions Berlet’s “crusade” against Progressives who stray from Berlet's ideological fever swamps" [http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=10352] |
| | | | |
| | Berlet outed the unnamed source and linked him to [[Holocaust denial]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Information_Research#_note-0] | | Berlet outed the unnamed source and linked him to [[Holocaust denial]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Information_Research#_note-0] |
| − | :"This complaint was written by Daniel Brandt, who I criticized because he was urging people on the left to read the anti-Semitic ''Spotlight'' newspaper (at the time published by Holocaust denier Willis Carto) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cberlet/Archive_2005-06_2005-08#Red-baiting_Lie_Article.21] | + | :"This complaint was written by Daniel Brandt," [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cberlet/Archive_2005-06_2005-08#Red-baiting_Lie_Article.21] |
| | | | |
| − | with the intent to get the criticism removed. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Political_Research_Associates#Fairness_and_Balance] Berlet's self published guilt by association smear[http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/orgs/american/ftp.py?orgs/american//political-research-associates/right.w.left] first appeared in September of 1991 in the ''extremist'' the Marxist-Leninist ''Guardian'' [http://www.publiceye.org/berlet/berlet_articles.html] newspaper and is cited by a mainstream publisher, ''Prometheus Books'', as an extremsit publication. [http://www.questia.com/library/book/nazis-communists-klansmen-and-others-on-the-fringe-political-extremism-in-america-by-john-george-laird-wilcox.jsp ''Nazis, Communists, Klansmen, and Others on the Fringe: Political Extremism in America''], John George & Laird Wilcox, Chapter 9, pgs. 125-131, ISBN 1-57392-058-4. In addition to all these violations of Wikipedia's published policies Berlet cites himself, violates BLP, and personally inserts libelous material into an article about a fellow registered user. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Brandt&diff=55132392&oldid=55131921] | + | with the intent to get the criticism removed. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Political_Research_Associates#Fairness_and_Balance] Berlet's self published guilt by association smear [http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/orgs/american/ftp.py?orgs/american//political-research-associates/right.w.left] first appeared in September of 1991 in the ''extremist'' Marxist-Leninist ''Guardian'' [http://www.publiceye.org/berlet/berlet_articles.html] newspaper and is cited by a mainstream publisher, ''Prometheus Books'', as an extremist publication. [http://www.questia.com/library/book/nazis-communists-klansmen-and-others-on-the-fringe-political-extremism-in-america-by-john-george-laird-wilcox.jsp ''Nazis, Communists, Klansmen, and Others on the Fringe: Political Extremism in America''], John George & Laird Wilcox, Chapter 9, pgs. 125-131, ISBN 1-57392-058-4. In addition to these violations of Wikipedia's policies Berlet cites himself, violates BLP, and personally inserts libelous material into an article about a fellow registered user. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Brandt&diff=55132392&oldid=55131921] Jimbo Wales repeated SlimVirgin's claim that Brandt was not a "credible source" when he told ''Editor & Publisher'', |
| − | | |
| − | Jimbo Wales repeated SlimVirgin's claim that Brandt was not a "credible source" when he told ''Editor & Publisher'', | |
| | :"I don't regard him as a valid source about anything at all." [http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/hivemind.html] | | :"I don't regard him as a valid source about anything at all." [http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/hivemind.html] |
| | | | |
| − | When the possible malicious intent of slander was publicly exposed about why Brandt's bio was created, the undue weight of Wales comments were removed as "tabloid" (WP:RS). [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Brandt&diff=prev&oldid=104935334] On 18 April 2007 Wales unblocked Brandt to talk "about a productive way forward". [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_sanction_noticeboard/Unblocking_of_Daniel_Brandt#Unblocking_of_Daniel_Brandt] Brandt wrote to the Wikien-1 mailing list "I feel that Jimmy Wales made the wrong decision when he unbanned me a couple of days ago." After the nightmare of the past year and half Brandt wants the article deleted completly and is not interested in anything short of that. | + | When the possible malicious intent of slander was publicly exposed about why Brandt's bio was created, the undue weight of Wales comments were removed as "tabloid" (WP:RS). [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Brandt&diff=prev&oldid=104935334] On 18 April 2007 Wales unblocked Brandt to talk "about a productive way forward". [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_sanction_noticeboard/Unblocking_of_Daniel_Brandt#Unblocking_of_Daniel_Brandt] Brandt wrote to the Wikien-1 mailing list "I feel that Jimmy Wales made the wrong decision when he unbanned me a couple of days ago." After the nightmare of the past year and half Brandt wants the article deleted completly and is not interested in anything short of that. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2007-04-23/Brandt_unblock] |
| | | | |
| | ==Sinbad Hoax== | | ==Sinbad Hoax== |