Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,594
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 45:
Line 45: − +
→Daniel Brandt controversy: typo
==Daniel Brandt controversy==
==Daniel Brandt controversy==
The Daniel Brandt biographical entry was created with the intent to smear him as extreme so Brandt could no longer be cited as a critic of Chip Berlet. SlimVirgin, creator of the article stated twice she did not consider Brandt a credible source. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&diff=prev&oldid=9161554] A few weeks before creating Brandt's bio [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rangerdude User:Rangerdude] had aptly demonstrated Berlet's total lack of scholarly credentials [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Roots_of_anti-Semitism&diff=20212920&oldid=20187928] in the "Roots of Anti-Semitism" article. SlimnVirgin and Rangerdude had this exchange:
The Daniel Brandt biographical entry was created with the intent to smear him as extreme so Brandt could no longer be cited as a critic of Chip Berlet. SlimVirgin, creator of the article stated twice she did not consider Brandt a credible source. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&diff=prev&oldid=9161554] A few weeks before creating Brandt's bio [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rangerdude User:Rangerdude] had aptly demonstrated Berlet's total lack of scholarly credentials [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Roots_of_anti-Semitism&diff=20212920&oldid=20187928] in the "Roots of Anti-Semitism" article. SlimVirgin and Rangerdude had this exchange:
:'''WP:NOR#What counts as a reputable publication?''' says: "A magazine or press release self-published by a very extreme political or religious group would often not be regarded as "reputable". For example, Wikipedia would not rely only on an article in a '''Socialist Workers' Party'''... --SlimVirgin 07:12, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
:'''WP:NOR#What counts as a reputable publication?''' says: "A magazine or press release self-published by a very extreme political or religious group would often not be regarded as "reputable". For example, Wikipedia would not rely only on an article in a '''Socialist Workers' Party'''... --SlimVirgin 07:12, August 4, 2005 (UTC)