Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  13:02, August 26, 2016
→‎Fundamentalism and dispensationalism: correcting hyphen usage, as requested, replaced: th-century → th century
Line 20: Line 20:  
of God to be understood literally implied that [[Darwinism]] was contrary to the theory of design and was therefore clearly atheistic. Both in the ''Review'' and in ''What is Darwinism?'' (1874) Hodge vigorously attacked Darwinism. His views determined the position of the Seminary until his death in 1878.  
 
of God to be understood literally implied that [[Darwinism]] was contrary to the theory of design and was therefore clearly atheistic. Both in the ''Review'' and in ''What is Darwinism?'' (1874) Hodge vigorously attacked Darwinism. His views determined the position of the Seminary until his death in 1878.  
 
===Fundamentalism and dispensationalism===
 
===Fundamentalism and dispensationalism===
−
Sandeen (1970) finds the roots of [[Fundamentalism]] in an alliance of two 19th-century theologies, [[dispensationalism]] derived from the [[Plymouth Brethren]] movement and the ministry of [[John Nelson Darby]]. Believers in dispensationalism held a view of the church as a small group separate from major ecclesiastical institutions and primarily a spiritual fellowship. Their emphasis on Biblical literalism and their view of history as divided into seven dispensations had considerable influence in American Calvinistic denominations in the latter part of the century.  
+
Sandeen (1970) finds the roots of [[Fundamentalism]] in an alliance of two 19th century theologies, [[dispensationalism]] derived from the [[Plymouth Brethren]] movement and the ministry of [[John Nelson Darby]]. Believers in dispensationalism held a view of the church as a small group separate from major ecclesiastical institutions and primarily a spiritual fellowship. Their emphasis on Biblical literalism and their view of history as divided into seven dispensations had considerable influence in American Calvinistic denominations in the latter part of the century.  
    
The Princeton theology was a unique system constructed by Alexander and Hodge. It emphasized a pre-Kantian rationalistic methodology and Biblical inerrancy. Dispensationalism and Princeton theology, two movements with certain similarities and a common foe in Modernism. were drawn together in informal cooperation in a series of International Prophetic Conferences beginning in 1878. [[Premillennialism]] and Biblical inspiration provided the themes for the alliance. ''The Fundamentals'', a series of 12 pamphlets published from 1910 to 1915, was supported by Lyman Stewart, a Presbyterian layman and a follower of dispensationalism. Fundamentalism at the turn of the century was a religious movement of great vitality with definable antecedents in theological innovations of the 19th century and centered in the urban North. In the religious conflict of the 1920s Fundamentalists split often along dispensational and Princeton lines.<ref>Ernest R. Sandeen, "Toward a Historical Interpretation of the Origins of Fundamentalism". ''Church History'' 1967 36(1): 66-83. 0009-6407; Sandeen, ''The Roots of Fundamentalism: British and American Millenarianism, 1800-1930'' (1970).</ref>
 
The Princeton theology was a unique system constructed by Alexander and Hodge. It emphasized a pre-Kantian rationalistic methodology and Biblical inerrancy. Dispensationalism and Princeton theology, two movements with certain similarities and a common foe in Modernism. were drawn together in informal cooperation in a series of International Prophetic Conferences beginning in 1878. [[Premillennialism]] and Biblical inspiration provided the themes for the alliance. ''The Fundamentals'', a series of 12 pamphlets published from 1910 to 1915, was supported by Lyman Stewart, a Presbyterian layman and a follower of dispensationalism. Fundamentalism at the turn of the century was a religious movement of great vitality with definable antecedents in theological innovations of the 19th century and centered in the urban North. In the religious conflict of the 1920s Fundamentalists split often along dispensational and Princeton lines.<ref>Ernest R. Sandeen, "Toward a Historical Interpretation of the Origins of Fundamentalism". ''Church History'' 1967 36(1): 66-83. 0009-6407; Sandeen, ''The Roots of Fundamentalism: British and American Millenarianism, 1800-1930'' (1970).</ref>
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,183

edits

Navigation menu