Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
6 bytes removed ,  18:58, August 31, 2016
m
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:  
The starlight problem is not in any conflict with the description in the [[Genesis|Book of Genesis]], which says, "let there be light, and there was light."  It does not say, "let there be stars to generate light that can illuminate darkness," or "let there be light, and there was darkness that light later reached."
 
The starlight problem is not in any conflict with the description in the [[Genesis|Book of Genesis]], which says, "let there be light, and there was light."  It does not say, "let there be stars to generate light that can illuminate darkness," or "let there be light, and there was darkness that light later reached."
   −
There is no way to "date" the age of light observed in the sky. Moreover, it is likely that light traveled at a faster speed in the past, when energies were higher. It is also possible that the universe has expanded at a rate faster than the speed of light.
+
There is no way to "date" the age of light observed in the sky. It is possible that the speed of light is not constant, but this is not part of current thought. It is also possible that the universe has expanded at a rate faster than the speed of light.
    
[[image:Crab composite cx.jpg|right|thumb|250px|The Crab nebula, a supernova remnant]]
 
[[image:Crab composite cx.jpg|right|thumb|250px|The Crab nebula, a supernova remnant]]
50

edits

Navigation menu