Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 260:
Line 260: − +
Talk:Counterexamples to an Old Earth (view source)
Revision as of 13:54, September 24, 2016
, 13:54, September 24, 2016Forgot to sign
"The expansion of the universe is accelerating, something that would not occur if the Big Bang had happened billions of years ago; the acceleration suggests that the Big Bang (or creation) was recent"
"The expansion of the universe is accelerating, something that would not occur if the Big Bang had happened billions of years ago; the acceleration suggests that the Big Bang (or creation) was recent"
I accept the expansion of the universe is accelerating, but why should that mean the universe is only 6000 years old? It would be equally valid for it to be hundreds of thousands of years old.
I accept the expansion of the universe is accelerating, but why should that mean the universe is only 6000 years old? It would be equally valid for it to be hundreds of thousands of years old. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 09:54, 24 September 2016 (EDT)
(username removed)